Changes

The <i>[https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0299097803/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=0299097803&linkCode=as2&tag=dailyh0c-20&linkId=f5a54017286d465043454eeed2a5aec1 Law Economic Growth: Legal History of the Lumber Industry in Wisconsin 1836-1915]</i>, an exhaustive study the Wisconsin timber industry, attempts to do just that. Hurst argued here that legal history had previously exaggerated the importance of the judicial process and common law doctrine. Instead he sought to show that “great issues of policy” were instead contained in the legislative history and the law of real and personal property.<ref>Hurst, James Willard, <i>Law and Economic Growth</i>, The Harvard University Press, 1964, p. xi-xii.</ref>

Furthermore, Hurst admits that there were not any important legal cases relating to the Wisconsin timber industry, but instead his study showed how the nineteenth century Wisconsin community was quick to use law as practical means to exploit an important and profitable resource.<ref>Hurst, p. 607-608.</ref> Hurst states that the story of Wisconsin’s lumber industry was of a secondary importance to him and that his primary concern was to show how “the interaction of legal and economic institutions yielded a product relevant to broader social theory.” (Hurst, p. xx.) In order to achieve this goal, Hurst analyzed “the interaction of all the relevant legal agencies (every piece of official paper) surrounding the changes in a given public policy over time.”<ref>Novak, William, “Law, Capitalism, and the Liberal State,” <i>Law and History Review</i>, vol. 18, 2000, p. 114.</ref>